
"What makes a blog good?" was the question that Mr.Sen pointed at us, and we came up with some. Then, we were asked to make a "blog rubric". So here's the one that I made with my group mate : Eslin S.
| Excellent 5 | Good 4 | Satisfactory 3 | Mediocre 2 | Poor 1 |
Engaging | The ideas and information are truly engaging, compelling and convincing. The blog is visually appealing and matching colors are present with a catching layout. The visuals and writings are in an excellent harmony. | Generally there are interesting, relevant ideas with few visual elements. The blog is mostly engaging. | The ideas are sometimes irrelevant with few major errors but the blog is overall catching. | No use of visual elements, the blog is frequently flat, the ideas are repetitive and mostly not interesting. | The blog is tedious, including very poor or no ideas. No visual elements. |
Informative | There is a use of also other resources, the information is rich, highly accurate and precise. Excellent interpretations, point of views and comments are present. | Generally informative, there are no other resources used. There are limited point of views which sometimes include minor errors. | The information is mostly accurate with few major errors about business concepts, theories and models, but the comments are not enough and sometimes wrong. | The business concepts, theories and models are frequently not applied correctly, there are few accurate information, with major errors. | The information is not accurate; there are lots of mistakes and misconceptions about business terms, theories and concepts. There’s no proof of critical thinking. |
Persuasiveness | The rich information and highly interesting ideas contribute to the general idea. Excellent comments, interpretations and opinions which truly affect or add to the audience’s point of view. | Ideas and information are generally related, the resources and examples mostly support the ideas and there are almost no major errors. | The information occasionally justifies the ideas but the resources and examples given are limited and poor, which do not create a truly persuasive effect on the audience. | There is an attempt in persuading and convincing the audience, but the ideas and information are not justified correctly. | The ideas and information are not convincing and mostly wrong. Unrelated/opposing ideas are defended. |
Language | Able to captures the interest of future employers. The language used includes the correct utilization of business terms, concepts and theories with excellent interpretations and metaphors. | The business terms, concepts and theories are generally used correctly. The interpretations are mostly logical. | The business terms, concepts and theories are occasionally irrevelant and there are some major business language mistakes. | There is an attempt in using the business terms, but not successfully used. Unable to draw future employers’ attention. | No business terms used or the used ones are mostly wrong. Major errors and misconceptions. The language is simple and not official enough. |
No comments:
Post a Comment